Somewhere, in an alternate universe, the resident of 221 B Baker St, as imagined by Arthur Conan Doyle, is looking at his new roommate and wondering who the hell this is and why his parents were just as cruel as to name him Sherlock Holmes.
Michelle and I took her brother Kevin, father and stepmother to go see Sherlock Holmes with Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law tonight and I will say that it was a fun movie, if not exactly the smartest movie. However, I'm finding as I think about the movie more, the only thing that was necessarily off was the date; the villain makes mention of the American Civil War as a very recent thing, placing the movie in the mid-late 1860s or the early 1870s, and the books take place in the 1880s.
However, there are bits that do play true. The VR that he shoots in his wall while testing out his "gunshot silencing device" is a nice touch from the books. The drug use, the misogyny, apparently even the erratic behavior of Downey's performance, were all taken in some way from particular readings of the books. I think the only issue I have is that they made Irene Addler into a criminal; in the books she does pull a swindle on Sherlock Holmes, one of the few to ever outwit him, and earns his esteem (the picture in the movie is also a nice nod to the books as it was a payment for a job he did and one of his treasured possessions).
One of the things I liked about the movie is that it was very neat. Just as with the stories, by the end Sherlock is able to wrap up all of the details, all the way down to who did and why. The nod toward Moriarty is good as well and I hope this does well enough to get a sequel (which they very unsubtly hinted at).
Jude Law, as Watson, was actually surprisingly good and I liked that they placed the movie late in the duo's career, shortly before his marriage and partial retirement.
One aspect of the movie I thoroughly enjoyed was the supporting characters in Lestrade and Constable Clark. I think they added a very nice flavor to the story and I enjoyed the banter between the characters (and I was pleased that Lestrade was still the butt of all the jokes; "You know, in an alternate universe you'd be a criminal." "And in an alternate universe you would be a good police inspector.")
The things that I felt they got wrong was the clothing and the hygiene. Holmes was a very clean individual and particular in his dress, especially in his costumes. The entire movie he looks half put together and he has an exchange with Watson where the latter accuses him of stealing his clothing.
Overall, I think Downey did a good job of displaying the cold, machine-like side of Sherlock Holmes while being able to portray the emotions that did lurk behind his calculating exterior; his affection for Watson and his esteem for Addler were very apparent in the novels.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. It seemed much more...actiony then a Holmes movie should've necessarily, but I think that's a necessary sacrifice to the feel of the stories in order to hold people's interests; a movie too cerebral would've been dull. I will be buying it and I would recommend seeing this film, even if you have to pay full price.
Michelle and I took her brother Kevin, father and stepmother to go see Sherlock Holmes with Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law tonight and I will say that it was a fun movie, if not exactly the smartest movie. However, I'm finding as I think about the movie more, the only thing that was necessarily off was the date; the villain makes mention of the American Civil War as a very recent thing, placing the movie in the mid-late 1860s or the early 1870s, and the books take place in the 1880s.
However, there are bits that do play true. The VR that he shoots in his wall while testing out his "gunshot silencing device" is a nice touch from the books. The drug use, the misogyny, apparently even the erratic behavior of Downey's performance, were all taken in some way from particular readings of the books. I think the only issue I have is that they made Irene Addler into a criminal; in the books she does pull a swindle on Sherlock Holmes, one of the few to ever outwit him, and earns his esteem (the picture in the movie is also a nice nod to the books as it was a payment for a job he did and one of his treasured possessions).
One of the things I liked about the movie is that it was very neat. Just as with the stories, by the end Sherlock is able to wrap up all of the details, all the way down to who did and why. The nod toward Moriarty is good as well and I hope this does well enough to get a sequel (which they very unsubtly hinted at).
Jude Law, as Watson, was actually surprisingly good and I liked that they placed the movie late in the duo's career, shortly before his marriage and partial retirement.
One aspect of the movie I thoroughly enjoyed was the supporting characters in Lestrade and Constable Clark. I think they added a very nice flavor to the story and I enjoyed the banter between the characters (and I was pleased that Lestrade was still the butt of all the jokes; "You know, in an alternate universe you'd be a criminal." "And in an alternate universe you would be a good police inspector.")
The things that I felt they got wrong was the clothing and the hygiene. Holmes was a very clean individual and particular in his dress, especially in his costumes. The entire movie he looks half put together and he has an exchange with Watson where the latter accuses him of stealing his clothing.
Overall, I think Downey did a good job of displaying the cold, machine-like side of Sherlock Holmes while being able to portray the emotions that did lurk behind his calculating exterior; his affection for Watson and his esteem for Addler were very apparent in the novels.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. It seemed much more...actiony then a Holmes movie should've necessarily, but I think that's a necessary sacrifice to the feel of the stories in order to hold people's interests; a movie too cerebral would've been dull. I will be buying it and I would recommend seeing this film, even if you have to pay full price.
3 comments | Leave a comment

